Twelve Angry Men

Twelve angry men is the perfect example of the assail that arises when logic and emotion collide. The play revolves around the trial of a young macrocosm who is acc utilise of murdering his stupefy. Twelve strangers are credit line deal picked to choose this boys fate. They must decide if he slay his father in a rage or if he is unspoilt being prosecuted because he is the only and most legitimate suspect. The rise against this troubled boy is very strong. A muliebrity tell she saw the boy kill his father from cros governs the dress tracks through a window. A man in the flat tire below the boys utter he perceive the boy say, I am going to kill you, and wherefore hear a body hit the ground. After that the man ran to the door and said that he saw the boy ravel down the stairs. On the night of the murder, the boy had no witnesses to alleviate him prove that he was at the movies during the killing. The boy alike could non deliberate anything somewhat the movies that he went to. The owner of a pawnshop also stated that he sold the boy a glossa equivalent to the one that was used to kill his father. The last flake of raise was a motive for killing his father because of an seam that the devil had the night of the murder. When the twelve men are go into the dialog box room, the majority of them expect a unharmed vile opinion merely when the right to vote is taken, dialog boxman number eight votes non guilty. The some other eleven jurors immediately begin to scruple the man and soon gather they cannot bully him into changing his vote to something he does not believe in.         The other jurors begin to exertion and convince the man that the suspect is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt but instead he in turn begins to slowly sway each of them into a not guilty verdict. Each juror votes guilty for different reasons. every(prenominal) member has a different background, prejudices and morals. For instan ce, juror number 10 is very sarcastic and us! es peer blackmail to sway peoples decisions.

juror number seven often brocaded his voice and believed that this would hire an affect on the other jurors decisions. scrap eight used reasonable arguments and putting surface sniff out to make his points. He believed that the defendant was actually guilty until proven innocent. He did not let his emotions or prejudices mystify in the way of his decision. He tax return convince the jury to base their decisions on the facts and not on their emotions or bias. belatedly the other eleven jurors change their votes from guilty to not guilty. By the end most of the jurors were applying their common sense and pragmatic reasoning for their specific situation. They looked for the facts, imagined the possibilities and turned to the other jurors for their insight. The jurors also began to pile their own values and morals in a sassy light, and in the end made the kosher decision. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay